Advertisement



|
|
|
|
|
|
|

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
2 stars for “3:10” Print E-mail
Written by MICHAEL JAMES ALLEN   
Friday, 07 September 2007
Genres have a funny way of fading in and out of popularity as the years go by. For instance, I never would have guessed that the raunchy sex comedies of the ‘80’s would ever see a comeback but last month’s hilarious “Superbad” proved me wrong, and I suspect it marks the start of an onslaught of films in which teenagers drop the F-Bomb while trying to score booze and sex. On the flip side, the recently invented “torture porn” genre seems headed for obscurity, if failures like “Hostel: Part II” and “Captivity” are any indication. Expect to see less blood-drenched machetes and severed heads in the future.

“3:10 to Yuma”
Entertainment
Art

Directed by James Mangold
Written by Halsted Welles, Michael Brandt, and Derek Haas
Based on the short story by Elmore Leonard
Starring Russell Crowe, Christian Bale, and Ben Foster
Rated R for violence and some language
Released on September 7, 2007

I bring all this up in order to herald the possible return of the Western, a genre that is perhaps the biggest victim of these previously mentioned trends. The last real, gritty Western I remember seeing was 1992’s “Unforgiven” (or, to sillier effect, 1993’s “Tombstone”), but this month sees the release of two back to back: “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” and “3:10 to Yuma.” It seems as though Hollywood (and, potentially, audiences) have taken a new interest in gunslingers and tumbleweeds and grizzled outlaws, but have they really? If what I’ve heard is correct, “The Assassination of Jesse James…” is thought-provoking and beautiful but about as much a true Western as “Back to the Future III." As for “3:10 to Yuma,” well, the film desperately wants to be a Western, and has moments that seem to fulfill this promise, but it ultimately collapses under it’s own pretension and Oscar lust.

“3:10 to Yuma” tells the story of Dan Evans (Christian Bale), a disabled Civil War vet who has found himself on hard times: A drought has brought famine to his ranch, and a local railroad baron is looking to steal his property from under him. Just as Dan is at an all time low, both financially and self-esteem-wise, enter Ben Wade (Russell Crowe), the infamous carriage hijacker and outlaw. Wade is in town with his ruthless gang, celebrating a recent robbery, and winds up in the wrong place at the wrong time, leading to his eventual capture. Wade is sentenced to hanging, which requires him to be escorted to a nearby town so that he can catch the 3:10 train to Yuma Penitentiary. Dan and a ragtag group of men (featuring Peter Fonda, Dallas Roberts, and the always enjoyable Alan Tudyk) end up getting charged with the escort—a dangerous task as Wade’s bloodthirsty gang will do anything to get him back—and the rest of the film details their dangerous journey to reach the train on time. Along the way, Dan and Wade gradually learn more about one another and discover that they are not as different from one another as they might have initially thought.

It all sounds very serious and it is played that way. The biggest problem here is that everyone involved in the film takes the plot (based on a short story by the pulp-tastic Elmore Leonard) too seriously, trying to bestow every character, every moment, every piece of dialogue with depth and importance. This is an unnecessary burden that is ultimately unfounded. When I go to see a serious drama about racism or death I expect to see these things, but when I go to see a Western I want to see shoot-outs, bank robberies, thrilling chases on horseback. “3:10 to Yuma” has all these things but they feel neutered, as though they were included purely because they had to be. Because of this, the thrills are woefully sparse, balanced instead with endless scenes of men sitting around campfires saying MEANINGFUL things.

This feeling is exacerbated by Bale and Crowe, two leading men who seem to take their work way too seriously. Christian Bale plays Dan with an intense gaze and a perpetual frown. While I’ve admired his intensity in films like “Batman Begins” and “American Psycho,” he is so dour here that you want to shout at the screen “Lighten up!” As for Crowe, he fairs slightly better, but is hampered by the fact that Ben Wade is not fearsome, crafty, or cunning—essential traits when you’re supposedly the most infamous gunslinger in the West. In fact, the only person in the film who seems to understand what a Western is all about is Ben Foster, in a breakthrough performance, as Wade’s heinous right-hand man. Foster plays his role with relish, sneering and chewing scenery while keeping his character believable and never overstaying his welcome. Every time Foster is on camera the film lightens up a bit, promising to be the balls-to-the-wall Western we’re hoping for. This, unfortunately, makes the moments he’s off-screen (of which there are many) all the more empty.

All in all, “3:10 to Yuma” is not a bad movie; it is competently made and offers some solid supporting performances that makes the film shine at times. I appreciate it for the fact that it marks the return of the Western, but let’s hope that, in the future, they wont all take themselves so seriously.

Comments

Write Comment
Name:Guest
Title:
Comment:



Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

< Previous   Next >
Other Recent Articles by MICHAEL JAMES ALLEN:
The Top Ten Movies of 2007
An Interview with Diablo Cody and Ellen Page of “Juno”
An Interview with “The Savages” director, Tamara Jenkins
Bang! Kapow! BOOM! ‘Nuff said.
An Interview with Danny Boyle

Polls
I would love to see Lumino feature