Advertisement



|
|
|
|
|
|
|

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Woodcock Won’t Float Print E-mail
Written by JORDAN BRANDES   
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
The past can sometimes come back to haunt us. In other cases the present is so horrible you’ll wish it were the future already. Such is the case with Mr. Woodcock a comedy so horrible that you’ll spend the whole time wishing you didn’t actually just shell out ten bucks for it.

"Mr. Woodcock"
Entertainment
Art

Directed by: Craig Gillespie
Written by: Michael Carnes, Josh Gilbert
Starring: Billy Bob Thorton, Seann William Scott, and Susan Sarandon
The film tells the story of John Farley (Sean William Scott) who as a child was horrendously harassed in gym class by his evil teacher Mr. Woodcock (Billy Bob Thorton). As one of the chubbier kids in his class little Farley gets the bulk of Woodcocks wrath. Now an adult Farley is the best selling author of a self-help book geared toward letting go of your past. Riding high on fame Farley becomes the recipient of his hometown’s Corn Cob Key a prestigious honor in the little farming community. Honored at the prize Farley decides to return home despite the pleas of his ever-present publicist (played by the always annoying Amy Poehler of SNL fame).

Much to his surprise Farley learns that his widowed mother (Susan Sarandon) is now deeply involved with his old nemesis Mr.Woodcock. The only reason this movie got even one star is the fact that it contained a truly great cast. Unfortunately, the writing and directing is so bad that it easy to forgot there is such talent at work.

To be honest, Mr. Woodcock would have made a really good drama. The level of pain and humiliation Woodcock inflicts on his students is not only mean but also probably illegal in almost every state. Thorton plays Woodcock so cold that even with the highly predictable happy ending there isn’t one redeemable quality in his character.

The entire cast seemed stuck in their one-dimensional roles unable to produce anything of real value. Billy Bob Thorton’s portrayal of Mr. Woodcock is so dull that there were times it felt as if a cardboard cutout was on the screen. The typically funny Seann William Scott, who was finally given the chance to go beyond the typical Stiffler role, felt as if he was practicing lines from some other film. The most wasted of the cast was without a doubt Susan Sarandon. Though essential to the total plot the role of the mother could have been played by literally anyone. Sarandon seemed as bored with the role as everyone else in the movie.

The far more disappointing detail is that it took a staff of two writers to come up with the dribble that counts as dialogue in this movie. The writing teams previous work include the quickly forgotten “The 80’s Show” and one episode of “Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place”. With that kind of resume it is no surprise they landed a feature film.

If you choose to spend your weekend at the movies do yourself a favor and skip this sad excuse for a movie. In the age of multiplexes the odds are good that there will be something worth spending your money on. Don’t let Mr.Woodcock bully you into wasting your time.

Comments
uhhh
Written by Guest on 2007-09-19 13:47:26
if it's so bad why did you give it 3 1/2 stars? It does look awful though! But I totally disagree about Amy Poehler, she's talented sometimes.
Written by Guest on 2007-09-24 20:34:39
That was actually a computer error, I orginally gave it only 1 star. Trust me it doesn't deserve anything more than that  
-Jordan Brandes

Write Comment
Name:Guest
Title:
Comment:



Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

< Previous   Next >
Other Recent Articles by JORDAN BRANDES:
For Your Consideration - This Week in Chicago
For Your Consideration - This Week in Chicago
FAD 2008 Finds Future Fashion in Chicago
For Your Consideration - This Week in Chicago
The Future of Fashion

Polls
I would love to see Lumino feature